Seeking Clean Slate, NFL Picks New Chairmen For Concussion Panel

0 comments

Posted on 18th March 2010 by Gordon Johnson in Brain Injury

, , , , ,

The National Football League, under pressure to devise a policy on concussions that will safeguard players, Tuesday shook up its committee on head injuries. It appointed two new co-chairman to head that panel.

As The New York Times put it, with its actions this week the NFL appears to be “distancing” itself from its lax and rather embarrassing past record regarding concussions. We agree. For example, the league didn’t fare very well discussing its head-injury policies during hearings before the House Judiciary Committee in October. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/17/sports/17concussions.html?ref=sports

Seemingly looking for a fresh start, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell named Dr. H. Hunt Batjer, chairman of neurological surgery at Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Evanston, Ill., and Dr. Richard Ellenbogen, chief of neurological surgery at Harborview Medical Center in Seattle, to head the NFL head, neck and spine medical committee.

That’s the new name for what had formerly been called since its 1994 founding the mild traumatic brain injury committee.

Batjer and Ellenbogen will replace Dr. Ira Casson and Dr. David Vann, who left as co-chairmen last fall. Casson had been skewered during the hearings in Washington for his stubborn refusal to agree that there was a connection between head injuries and higher raters of dementia among retired NFL players.

And there was another piece of news Tuesday. It was disclosed that Dr. Elliott Pellman, who had remained a member of the NFL brain injury panel after stepping down as its chairman in 2007, has resigned as even a member of the group.

An NFL spokesman told The Times that the committee purview had been broadened to include the neck and spine because they areas tied into brain injury.

In a statement, Ellenbogen seemed to make it clear that he considers player head injuries a serious issue.

“I am humbled and honored to be participating in a program by the NFL that recognizes the widespread problem of concussion, which occurs in a wide spectrum of our population, from student-athletes to soldiers to professional athletes,” Ellenbogen said. “I hope through our actions, research and advocacy, we can improve the prevention and treatment of this public health issue for athletes in all sports and at all levels of play.” Batjer and Ellenbogen didn’t wait too long to take action. They are adding Dr. Mitchel Bergen, chairman of neurological surgery at U.C. San Francisco, to the committee. Berger is not a mere academic: He was a defensive end at Harvard University and even tried out for the Chicago Bears in 1974.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

College Basketball Sees An Increase in Concussions

0 comments

Posted on 6th March 2010 by Gordon Johnson in Brain Injury

, , , , , , ,

Football isn’t the only sport that is causing concussions in players: There has been a rise in head injuries for college basketball players.

In a detailed story, the Associated Press suggests that college hoops has gotten more physical and fast-paced with more massive players, and this is leading to more concussions. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/basketball/ncaa/wires/03/05/2060.ap.bkc.concussions.on.rise.adv07.1263/

The issue has become so serious that the National Collegiate Athletic Association will hold a summit on concussions this spring.

Head and face injuries in all NCAA divisions have risen 6.2 percent from 1984 to 2004, a study by the National Athletic Trainers Association found, with concussions making up 3.6 percent of all injuries reported. Strangely enough, female hoops players were three times more likely to sustain a concussion than male players.

Several marquee players – such as Michigan State’s Delvon Roe and UCLA’s Malcolm Lee – have been forced to sit out games and practices after they exhibited the symptoms of concussions. And the Air Force basketball team has suffered at least six concussions this season.

College players are no longer “pipe-cleaner thin,” according to AP, and “the game has adapted to the size and strength of its players, becoming more about power than finesse.”

Let’s see if the college basketball moves faster to address the concussion problem than other pro and collegiate sports.

The obvious counter to the thesis of this research is not that concussions have gotten more frequent, but that the diagnosis of concussions has changed. It is unlikely that concussion itself is increasing. The game has changed very much. But now, trainers, coaches and fans understand the symptoms, and players injuries are given more attention. That is a good thing.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Vermont Mulls Concussion Law For Student Players

0 comments

Posted on 1st March 2010 by Gordon Johnson in Brain Injury

, , , , ,

Vermont has joined the growing group of states that are weighing laws regarding student athletes returning to play after sustaining a concussion, according to the Rutland Herald.
http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20100301/NEWS03/100229936/1004/NEWS03

The bill pending in Vermont was proposed by a lawmaker who is also a physician, Rep. George Till of Jericho, Vt. Till is particularly concerned about so-called “second-impact syndrome,” where a second head injury leads to permanent brain damage. His bill would bar athletes from coming back to the field any sooner than one day after any symptoms they have go away.

Till’s bill, which is aimed at sports and athletes in Vermont public schools, mandates that players who sustain a concussion would need to get a doctor’s note before returning to sports. Coaches would also have to take new medical training.

The bill has its opponents, including physicians and trainers who argue that the law shouldn’t be used to prescribe medical care. That objection is just ridiculous. Banning an early return is not practicing medicine. It is just making sure.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Sport and Brain Injury Prevention – The Rules Must Protect the Athlete, Even Against Themselves

1 comment

Posted on 16th February 2010 by Gordon Johnson in Brain Injury

, , , , , ,

The best cure for brain injury is prevention. It is one of the first things I learned as I began my advocacy in this field and is one of the often repeated missions of the Brain Injury Association. Yet, life causes brain injury and one does not give up living because it comes with risks of injury. Thus, as we reflect on the public issues of concussion and death in sport, I want to think out loud as I articulate some philosophies about “living” and “brain injury prevention.”

Let’s start with the simplest example. Our brains were not designed to travel at speeds above 60 mph, even in a car. While the skull and the protective mechanisms around our brain do an adequate job of protecting us from primitive and medieval forces, evolution has not had time to adapt to the intense acceleration/deceleration forces involved in motor vehicle accidents. Our world and our brains would be safer if we didn’t drive automobiles. But we would all starve. Cost benefit analysis: make cars safer but accept that there are some brains will be injured when cars crash into each other.

I am a football fan. I am the kind of football fan who watches pre-season games and knows how many regular season touchdowns a certain former Packer has thrown in his career. If you were to tell me that each time a Packer quarterback got hit on a pass, we had to pull him out of the game to determine if he had suffered a concussion, then I would tell you I couldn’t stand to watch the sport anymore. That obviously would be too extreme.

Even if you told me that my team’s quarterback couldn’t start the week after he suffered a Grade Two concussion, because he was still symptomatic after 15 minutes, I would be extremely frustrated about it.
I use the 7 day example because the American Academy of Neurology’s Sport and Concussion Guidelines, as originally published, required an asymptomatic period of 7 days from any concussion that was symptomatic longer than 15 minutes. So if you got hurt in a 12 noon game one Sunday, you couldn’t play in the next weeks game if still symptomatic after 15 minutes if the game was at noon.
For this reason I have preferred the NFL’s slightly more flexible approach to return to play considerations, even though I do comprehend that there is some risk (cost) involved. The reason, there is an overall benefit to returning an NFL quarterback to play (millions of dollars, millions of fans’ need to see their team play competitively).

In contrast, I am a firm believer that scholastic and true amateur athletes should never return to play after a concussion until they have passed rigorous and sensitive medical tests. There is just not a sufficient “benefit” to justify the “cost”. No amateur’s return to play should be so important to justify any risk of further injury, especially when dealing with young athletes who may be more susceptible to the impact of a second or third concussion. Yet, I am likewise not a believer in a strict three month (or not in that season) rule as then the disincentive to report the concussion, for both the team and the player, would be so great that we might do far more harm from underreporting.

In all sport safety issues, the leagues, the organizations, the teams must take responsibility to make rules to protect the athletes, because the competitive nature of sport virtually ensures an unsafe environment without them. The athletes themselves will almost always choose wrong on the cost/benefit curve. For example – in snowboarding, luge, NASCAR – the competitor’s will to win virtually ensures that they will take unsafe risks. In football, the harder and more recklessly you hit your opponent, the more likely you will stop them. If there are no rules and no safety measures in these sports, they might as well be contests to the death, because that is what the consequences could be.

As I look at the cost/benefit analysis of risk versus winning in sport, I first ask myself, what is the purpose of this sport. If the purpose is to harm your opponent, such as boxing, I believe that any societal need this sport provides is strictly appealing to the blood thirst in us, and does not justify any risk. Boxing and other unarmed combat should be banned for the same reason we do not have gladiators and Christians versus the lions.

In contrast, if it is a sport like skiing, snowboarding, luge, then the mandate is for safety rules and guidelines. The sport governing authorities must define the limits of what risk it allows for its athletes. It cannot be left up to the athlete. It is really no different than steroids in baseball players. The entertainment value of the sport benefits from steroids, yet we ban them because of the danger to the athlete. Yet we know that if we do not ban them, the competitive pressures on the athlete will induce a high percentage of them to use them.

In the last month, we have seen some tremendous institutional progress towards making brain’s safer in sport. What the NFL has done, not only for the safety of its own players but the safety of all who play the sport is admirable and meaningful change. And Congress’s role in motivating the NFL is also to be congratulated. See our blog at http://www.tbilaw.com/blog/2010/01/good-year-for-concussion-advocacy.html In contrast, what NASCAR did in allowing more contact to increase ratings is deplorable. See our blog at http://www.tbilaw.com/blog/2010/01/nascar-vows-to-return-to-roots-as.html If the luge death at the Winter Olympics turns out to be as a result of negligent or reckless design of the luge run, then that is even more outrageous. As far as snow boarding, the governing body needs to ban the most dangerous of stunts. It cannot be left to the athletes discretion. See our blog at http://www.subtlebraininjury.com/blog/2010/02/snowboarder-pearces-head-injuries-dont.html


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Olympic Sports Like Snowboarding and Skiing Rival Football In Terms of Injuries

0 comments

Posted on 8th February 2010 by Gordon Johnson in Brain Injury

, , , ,

A year ago, Natasha Richardson reminded all of us that sport concussions happen in sports other than football and that average people can suffer, not just famous athletes. With the Winter Games approaching it will be world class athletes who may stir up the conversation again, but in a newer sport, one without a tradition of safety: snowboarding.

There are already worries that snowboarders in Vancouver will be cracking their heads as they compete in the counterculture sport, as The San Francisco Chronicle called it, which was admitted to the Olympics in 1998.

The Chronicle noted that “maneuvers in the halfpipe have grown from exhilarating to terrifying in the four years since Shaun White won the gold in Turin, and the champ’s face smacked against the lip of the pipe at the Winter X Games last weekend, sending his helmet flying.” http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/02/07/SP921BR2N0.DTL

The International Olympics Committee is criticized for not setting safety standards for snowboarding, and letting the International Skiing Federation govern it.

The Miami Herald also weighed in on the issues, in a story headlined “Winter Olympics Flirting With Danger.” http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/olympics/story/1467130.html

The article cites snowboarder Kevin Pearce, who hit his forehead on the wall of a half-pipe and sustained traumatic brain injury. He is now at a long-term rehabilitation facility.

“Combine snow, ice, expressway speeds, six-story heights,” The Herald writes. “Think NASCAR on a slippery track or gymnastics with a helmet but without a mat. Imagine plunging down a slope as hard as concrete in a skinsuit or sliding down a roller coaster on a steel cookie sheet or flying through the air without a parachute.”

Not only snowboarders but skiers face serious injury, prompting some to call for safety reforms.

Will snowboarding reform? Will the thrill of the daredevil be replaced by some common sense about permanent damage to the minds of these young people?

We have been discussing the different trends of two of America’s most popular sports with respect to head injury risk in recent weeks. Today, at http://subtlebraininjury.com.blog we talk about the NFL’s growing commitment to player brain safety. Last week we talked about NASCAR’s preference for ratings rather than safety. The NFL seems to have learned that protecting its assets (the players) is more important than making the sport more sensational. NASCAR has clearly not.

We can only hope that the leaders of this Olympic sport show plan ahead rather than react to some tragedy.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Congressman Skewers College Football Conferences For Their Lenient Concussion Guidelines

0 comments

Posted on 2nd February 2010 by Gordon Johnson in Brain Injury

, , , , ,

A member of the House Judiciary Committee Monday blasted the Southeastern Conference and the Big 12 over their policies regarding student athletes and concussions, according to the Associated Press.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/02/sports/football/02concussions.html

Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., levied the criticism during a hearing in Houston on head injuries and college football. Specifically, Cohen questioned why major college football conferences had not adopted rules on dealing with concussions that went beyond what the National Collegiate Athletic Association requires, according to AP.

During the hearing, Cohen raised the question during his discussion with Ron Courson, who is director of sports medicine at the University of Georgia and part of the NCAA Committee on Competitive Safeguards and Medical Aspects of Sports.

Cohen “seemed incensed,” according to AP, when Courson said that none of the conferences had tougher regulations regarding concussions than the minimums mandated by the NCAA.

Cohen accused the college athletic programs of caring about “money, money, money,” AP reported.

On Monday there was also testimony by Texans guard Chester Pitts, who told the committee that he hopes his 3-year-old son Chester III never plays pro football, The Houston Chronicle reported in a very comprehensive story.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports/fb/texansfront/6846505.html
Pitts said that NFL football was “too rough a game,” according to the Chronicle. He played 112 NFL games without missing a start.

Pitts testified that he sustained his worst head injury while playing for San Diego State, and that the team hid his helmet to stop him from returning to the game, the Chronicle reported.

And former Rice University running back Trevor Cobb testified Monday that he had at least six concussions when he was playing football in high school, Rice and the NFL.

Monday’s hearing, held at the Prairie View A&M; College of Nursing, was the third one held by the House committee on brain injury and sports. It dealt with high school and college athletes. The first two hearings dealt with the NFL and its policies regarding concussions and players.

Neuropathologist Dr. Bennett Omalu, co-founder and director of the Brian Injury Research Instistute of West Virginia University, also testified in Houston Monday. He is a pioneer in linking concussions from football to permanent brain damage in players.

Omalu recommended that youths under 18, whose brains are still developing, should not be allowed to play until at least three months after concussion, so they won’t sustain permanent brain damage from additional hits on the field, the Houston Chronicle reported.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

NFL Football Concussions Versus Real World Brain Injuries

0 comments

Posted on 11th January 2010 by Gordon Johnson in Brain Injury

, , , , ,

I am always pleased when the news cycle shifts to concussion and brain injury because that raises public awareness that concussion means brain injury and that brain injuries can cause permanent brain damage. Thus, the NFL being grilled by Congress as to the safety of its players is a very good thing. Likewise, the greatly increased awareness of brain injury coming out of all the publicity that the Iraq and Afghanistan wars brain injuries is also increasing public awareness. But I always worry that people will think that because athletes recover from concussions so quickly, that accidental concussion does not have the potential to permanently injure someone.

The bigger problem in the legal arena is that there is some very bad research being published now that would directly correlate a young athlete’s recovery from a concussion to real world brain injuries. (I apologize to those who see the obvious that sports is also part of the real world, but I find the phrase works to distinguish better than the use of other terms, such as civilian, because of course athletes are civilians, too.)

So, before we spend the next several blogs commenting on the NFL Congressional hearings, I think it is important to discuss what makes accidental (real world) concussions potentially more serious than sports injuries. Here is a partial list.

Sport Concussion a Young Person Injury.
First, sport concussions typically happen to those with the greatest chance of a good recovery from concussion, young and athletic people. If we were going to list the three or four most common risk factors for a bad result from concussion, age would be at the top of that list. The reason for this is multiple but includes the fact that younger brains have a gene that stimulates neuronal regrowth that just does not exist when a person is over 40. The closer someone is to 40 at the time of the concussion, the more likely they will have persisting deficits from the brain injury.

Men Are at Less Risk. Most sport concussions happen to men and men are at less risk of poor outcomes from brain injury. This may be seem politically incorrect to say, but women are just simply more vulnerable, not just because they are not as strong, but also because concussive type forces are more likely to damage the white matter of the brain and women are more white matter dependant in there thinking. Complicated topic for another blog.

The Blow is Expected. Sport concussions happen to people who most times are prepared to get hit. The sport concussions that are the most serious are usually to someone who is surprised or motionless at the time of the blow. In contrast, almost all accidental concussions are a surprise. When the body knows it is going to get hit, it protects itself, considerably reducing the extent of and the arc of the acceleration/deceleration.

Athletes are Stronger. Sport concussions happen to people whose bodies have stronger muscles, which also significantly reduces the speed and the length of the acceleration/deceleration arc. When I speak about arc, I am speaking about how far forward, backwards or sideways the head will move on the neck, after being hit. It is this motion that accounts for most of the force on the brain’s axons.

There are about another half of dozen things I could add to this list, but the point of this blog is to remember when you hear about permanent brain damage to professional athletes, there is a far higher risk of that occurring to a 40 year old person who is in a motor vehicle wreck.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Sport Concussion Guidelines have Migrated to Accidental Injuries

0 comments

Posted on 2nd April 2008 by Gordon Johnson in Brain Injury

, , , , , ,

Most of the focus on changing definition of concussion has come out of concern about concussions in sport. Thru that work, beginning in the early 1990’s, it became standard practice that if an individual suffered a concussion in a sporting event, they should not be allowed to return to competition until certain objective criteria of recovery had occurred.

That research led to the Practice Parameters of Sports from the American Academy of Neurology and other Sports and Concussion guidelines. This insistence on continuous at first, then periodic monitoring before allowing a return to competition has been a near revolutionary change in the approach to concussion. While in practical reality they are not followed to the letter, at a minimum they create a structure for determining whether or not the concussion needs to be taken seriously.

All concussions should be taken seriously but if someone has a 15 minute recovery from a concussion, they are allowed to return to play on that day. Especially with young jocks if a recovery occurs in 15 minutes, it is overwhelmingly likely that they will have a good result.

That work that was done with concussion has helped to change the way in which concussions are defined and diagnosed in the real world. By saying real world concussions, I am talking about concussions that happen to average people in accidents, not sports, not military. While the Concussion in Sports guidelines are not definitionally extended to real world concussions, it has changed perspectives and has lead to the CDC publishing this kit, Heads Up Brain Injury in Your Practice. This is not just for athletes, but for concussed individuals across the board. Click here for the CDC booklet.

The CDC materials included Facts for Physicians about Mild Traumatic Brain. That definition does not limit the definition of concussion to what would be in these neurological treatises discussed earlier this week, such Principles of Neurology by Adams and Victor. It now is using the type of definition that is used for concussion in sports. That is the basic introduction as to where we stand and we look to the future of diagnosing Mild Brain Injury.

I have used the term concussion and the way I use it is synonymous with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (“MTBI’) in essence a concussion is a Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and the two terms do really mean the same thing, but I it is arguable that a concussion does not become a Mild Traumatic Brain Injury until the symptoms from that persist at least as long as the 15 minute requirement under the Sports and Concussion guidelines.

A concussion does involve injury to the brain. The kind of concussion that does involve injury to the brain that we would be concerned about in my practice as a lawyer who primary represents people with a mild brain injury is the kind of concussion where the symptoms are there the next day, there the next week, there the next month. The problem in determining whether or not someone is going to have a disabling concussion on the day of their accident is that it is not the symptoms they have at the time of their accident, not even the symptoms they have 15 minutes later but primarily their symptoms 24 hours later.

Tomorrow – the failure of the medical community to adopt the serial follow-up evaluations that are required in sport concussions.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney