National Federation of High Schools Imposes Tougher Rule on Concussions

0 comments

Posted on 27th February 2010 by Gordon Johnson in Brain Injury

, , , ,

The nation’s high schools are finally officially tightening rules regarding concussions and student athletes. Starting with this year’s football season, “any player who shows signs, symptoms or behaviors associated with a concussion must be removed from the game and shall not return to play until cleared by an appropriate health-care professional,” says a press release issued Tuesday by the National Federation of State High School Associations (NFHS).

http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/sports/highschool/varsityletters/2010/02/federation_rules_get_tough_on_football_concussions.html

Under the old rules, officials were only directed to remove an athlete from play if “unconscious or apparently unconscious.”

The concussion symptoms that officials must now look for now not only include loss of consciousness but also “headache, dizziness, confusion or balance problems.”

The press release also quotes Dr. Michael Koester, chairman of the NFHS Sports Medicine Advisory Committee.

“Given that the vast majority of concussions do not include a loss of consciousness…the NFHS Sports Medicine Advisory Committee strongly believes that officials should be empowered to remove these athletes from play, thus protecting them from further injury,” Koester said. “Continued participation in any sport following a concussion can lead to worsening concussion symptoms, as well as increased risk for further injury to the brain and even death.”

The National Federation of State High School Associations’ Football Rules Committee approved the rule change relating to concussions in a meeting last month, and that change was later approved by the NFHS board.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Did ‘Toughman’ Die of Second-Impact Syndrome?

0 comments

Posted on 26th February 2010 by Gordon Johnson in Brain Injury

, , ,

Nathan Johnson died just days after competing in an Original Toughman Contest. Some suspect he was the victim of so-called second-impact syndrome, a case where a previous head injury exacerbates a later head injury.
http://www.newsok.com/prior-injury-likely-set-stage-for-death-at-original-toughman-contest-doctor-says/article/3442071?custom_click=headlines_widget

The 23-year-old Johnson of Ada, Okla., passed away Tuesday, three days after fighting in the Toughman contest in Oklahoma City, Okla. In Toughman fights, fighters have padded headgear and 16-ounce gloves.

Johnson fought both Friday and Saturday, participating in several matches. After beating one opponent Saturday, Johnson beat another fighter and was set to battle yet another one when he fell ill and collapsed. He was taken to OU Medical Center for surgery. He had sustained a skull fracture and a cerebral hemorrhage, and was put in a medically induced coma.

Johnson had undergone preflight physicals and cardio checks, and they didn’t turn up any problems. But Johnson had complained to his parents on Saturday, after his Friday fight, that he had a headache and had “a shooting star” sensation in one of his eyes.

One doctor believes that Johnson has sustained brain damage on Friday night, and that led to Saturday’s deadly injury.

To add to the tragedy of such a young man dying, Johnson was engaged, and his fiancée is pregnant with the couple’s daughter.

There is just no getting around the “second impact” problem in boxing or other unarmed combatant contests. If we are serious about high school football no return to play rules, we must be also serious about stopping the modern gladiators.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Japanese Boxer Yamaki dies after Suffering Brain Trauma in Bout

0 comments

Posted on 23rd February 2010 by Gordon Johnson in Brain Injury

, , , ,

This month I commented on my thoughts about brain injury prevention and sport. See http://www.tbilaw.com/blog/2010/02/sport-and-brain-injury-prevention-rules.html I said this:

As I look at the cost/benefit analysis of risk versus winning in sport, I first ask myself, what is the purpose of this sport. If the purpose is to harm your opponent, such as boxing, I believe that any societal need this sport provides is strictly appealing to the blood thirst in us, and does not justify any risk. Boxing and other unarmed combat should be banned for the same reason we do not have gladiators and Christians versus the lions.


While our focus has been on brain injury in the Winter Olympics, the gladiators still try to kill each other in boxing. These predictably still succeed.

Japanese boxer Hirokazu Yamaki died at a Tokyo hospital Monday after suffering a traumatic brain injury during a match last weekend, Feb. 19, in the city, the Japan Boxing Commission said in a statement. http://www.japantoday.com/category/sports/view/japanese-boxer-yamaki-dies-after-suffering-brain-injury

Yamaki, 26, suffered an acute subdural hematoma in his eighth-round knockout loss against Toshimasa Ouchi on Friday night at Korakuen Hall. http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2010/2/22/1321788/japanese-boxer-hirokazu-yamaki

After being knocked out in the 8th round, Yamaki did not regain consciousness. He had emergency surgery at a Tokyo hospital to attempt to repair the brain damage. During the past few days doctors continued to try to treat and fix his injuries, but he died Monday morning. Yamaki made his pro boxing debut in October 2003. In the latest rankings in the Japanese flyweight division, he was No. 11, with a 7-9 record, including five knockouts.

We fans see boxing at its highest level, with great athletes like Roy Jones and Sugar Ray Leonard, dancing around the ring and later basking in the sweetness of their success. What we don’t see is the fights with 7-9 fighters, the fights with amateurs, with Golden Glove teenagers. How can we legitimately fight for the Lystedt Law and not ban all amateur fighting? The reason of course is that our kids play football and it is the poor kids who box. Yet, if the impetus for the Lystedt Law is partially the risk of the catastrophic brain injury that comes from the “second impact syndrome”, how can we not put a stop to boxing. Virtually every boxer who is knocked out, has had some previous concussive injury in the same bout. Certainly anyone with a TKO has had the double concussive blows in the same contest.

Boxing and other unarmed combat are essentially contests where eventually your opponent can no longer fight, because of the cumulative impact of a series of concussions. To call that sport is simply wrong. Why is Congress not having hearings on this?


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

New Research Confirms Concussions Take Permanent Toll

0 comments

Posted on 22nd February 2010 by Gordon Johnson in Brain Injury

, , , ,

New research has confirmed that Mild Traumatic Brain Injury causes persistent neurological and cognitive problems in patients, taking an emotional and financial toll on society.

Dr. Douglas Smith of Center for Brain Injury and Repair and professor of Neurosurgery at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, recently presented his findings on MTBI, also called concussions, at the 2010 meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in San Diego. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100219204409.htm

More than 1 million people each year suffer from MTBI, but too many physicians and medical providers don’t consider it a serious injury. http://www.ivanhoe.com/channels/p_channelstory.cfm?storyid=23565


In Smith’s study, he has used advanced neuroimaging techniques to secure data from humans and animals two to four days after they sustained their brain injury. Researchers found that there were changes in the white matter of the brain, and that protein markers linked to brain pathology also turned up with these subjects.

Smith found that the stretching and unhooking of nerve-cell axoms after a MTBI causes problems in the sodium channels found on neurons. While this issue has been discussed for years, including on our webpages, it is stil always good to hear new findings to confirm what we have been saying all along. See http://subtlebraininjury.com/microscopic.html For more about the process of brain injury, see http://subtlebraininjury.com


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Sport and Brain Injury Prevention – The Rules Must Protect the Athlete, Even Against Themselves

1 comment

Posted on 16th February 2010 by Gordon Johnson in Brain Injury

, , , , , ,

The best cure for brain injury is prevention. It is one of the first things I learned as I began my advocacy in this field and is one of the often repeated missions of the Brain Injury Association. Yet, life causes brain injury and one does not give up living because it comes with risks of injury. Thus, as we reflect on the public issues of concussion and death in sport, I want to think out loud as I articulate some philosophies about “living” and “brain injury prevention.”

Let’s start with the simplest example. Our brains were not designed to travel at speeds above 60 mph, even in a car. While the skull and the protective mechanisms around our brain do an adequate job of protecting us from primitive and medieval forces, evolution has not had time to adapt to the intense acceleration/deceleration forces involved in motor vehicle accidents. Our world and our brains would be safer if we didn’t drive automobiles. But we would all starve. Cost benefit analysis: make cars safer but accept that there are some brains will be injured when cars crash into each other.

I am a football fan. I am the kind of football fan who watches pre-season games and knows how many regular season touchdowns a certain former Packer has thrown in his career. If you were to tell me that each time a Packer quarterback got hit on a pass, we had to pull him out of the game to determine if he had suffered a concussion, then I would tell you I couldn’t stand to watch the sport anymore. That obviously would be too extreme.

Even if you told me that my team’s quarterback couldn’t start the week after he suffered a Grade Two concussion, because he was still symptomatic after 15 minutes, I would be extremely frustrated about it.
I use the 7 day example because the American Academy of Neurology’s Sport and Concussion Guidelines, as originally published, required an asymptomatic period of 7 days from any concussion that was symptomatic longer than 15 minutes. So if you got hurt in a 12 noon game one Sunday, you couldn’t play in the next weeks game if still symptomatic after 15 minutes if the game was at noon.
For this reason I have preferred the NFL’s slightly more flexible approach to return to play considerations, even though I do comprehend that there is some risk (cost) involved. The reason, there is an overall benefit to returning an NFL quarterback to play (millions of dollars, millions of fans’ need to see their team play competitively).

In contrast, I am a firm believer that scholastic and true amateur athletes should never return to play after a concussion until they have passed rigorous and sensitive medical tests. There is just not a sufficient “benefit” to justify the “cost”. No amateur’s return to play should be so important to justify any risk of further injury, especially when dealing with young athletes who may be more susceptible to the impact of a second or third concussion. Yet, I am likewise not a believer in a strict three month (or not in that season) rule as then the disincentive to report the concussion, for both the team and the player, would be so great that we might do far more harm from underreporting.

In all sport safety issues, the leagues, the organizations, the teams must take responsibility to make rules to protect the athletes, because the competitive nature of sport virtually ensures an unsafe environment without them. The athletes themselves will almost always choose wrong on the cost/benefit curve. For example – in snowboarding, luge, NASCAR – the competitor’s will to win virtually ensures that they will take unsafe risks. In football, the harder and more recklessly you hit your opponent, the more likely you will stop them. If there are no rules and no safety measures in these sports, they might as well be contests to the death, because that is what the consequences could be.

As I look at the cost/benefit analysis of risk versus winning in sport, I first ask myself, what is the purpose of this sport. If the purpose is to harm your opponent, such as boxing, I believe that any societal need this sport provides is strictly appealing to the blood thirst in us, and does not justify any risk. Boxing and other unarmed combat should be banned for the same reason we do not have gladiators and Christians versus the lions.

In contrast, if it is a sport like skiing, snowboarding, luge, then the mandate is for safety rules and guidelines. The sport governing authorities must define the limits of what risk it allows for its athletes. It cannot be left up to the athlete. It is really no different than steroids in baseball players. The entertainment value of the sport benefits from steroids, yet we ban them because of the danger to the athlete. Yet we know that if we do not ban them, the competitive pressures on the athlete will induce a high percentage of them to use them.

In the last month, we have seen some tremendous institutional progress towards making brain’s safer in sport. What the NFL has done, not only for the safety of its own players but the safety of all who play the sport is admirable and meaningful change. And Congress’s role in motivating the NFL is also to be congratulated. See our blog at http://www.tbilaw.com/blog/2010/01/good-year-for-concussion-advocacy.html In contrast, what NASCAR did in allowing more contact to increase ratings is deplorable. See our blog at http://www.tbilaw.com/blog/2010/01/nascar-vows-to-return-to-roots-as.html If the luge death at the Winter Olympics turns out to be as a result of negligent or reckless design of the luge run, then that is even more outrageous. As far as snow boarding, the governing body needs to ban the most dangerous of stunts. It cannot be left to the athletes discretion. See our blog at http://www.subtlebraininjury.com/blog/2010/02/snowboarder-pearces-head-injuries-dont.html


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Women’s Soccer Champ Chalupny Takes Leave Over Concussion-Related Issues

0 comments

Posted on 12th February 2010 by Gordon Johnson in Brain Injury

, , , , ,

Interestingly, this week I attended a sport and concussion lecture where both the doctor who was giving the lecture and one of the attendees both had daughters who were soccer goalies. Both had had problems with repeat concussions, from getting kicked in the head.

Not attending such lecture, but perhaps noticing all the press about concussions and the NFL, is the captain of the U.S. Women’s national soccer team, who announced today that she is taking an indefinite leave of absence and won’t play in an upcoming tournament in Portugal. http://www.usatoday.com/sports/soccer/2010-02-11-800829453_x.htm

Lori Chalupny, a 26-year-old St. Louis native, said she is taking a respite to deal with concerns regarding concussions, so she won’t be at the Feb. 24 Algarve Cup. http://www.globe-democrat.com/news/2010/feb/12/lori-chalupny-will-not-play-us-algarve-cup-matches/


“I am taking some time off so I can get some additional testing done for these concussion-related issues,” Chalupny said in a statement released Thursday by the St. Louis Athletica of Women’s Professional Soccer, the team she plays for.

“I need to go through this now to ensure my health for the future. I certainly don’t like the idea of missing a tournament like the Algarve Cup, or missing any time with Athletica,” Chalupny said. “I just need to get some rest and take care of issues.”

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/sports/stories.nsf/soccer/story/E62EAB88FC10F3CF862576C8000B8FFA?OpenDocument


The Athletica’s training camp starts March 1.

Chalupny took a time out for four months in 2006 after sustaining a concussion while playing in a tournament in China. She was accidentally kicked in the head by a player in a game against France at the Four Nations tournament in China.

During the U.S. soccer team’s opening match against Norway in the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games, Chalupny was accidentally punched in the jaw. She was benched the rest of that game, but played in subsequent Olympic games. The U.S. team won a gold medal.

Chalupny was also a member of the 2007 U.S. Women’s World Cup team.

Rest and no return to play are always the safest course with sport concussion. How long and how many concussions begin to leave cumulative disability, is still unknown. That is why we strongly believe in continuous testing until complete resolution of symptoms before returning an athlete to play. The harder challenge is how to make these determinations with accidental concussion, where there is less risk of a repeat blow to the head, but perhaps a greater risk of long term consequences.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

The Concussion/Football Story Catches Fire In The Press

1 comment

Posted on 11th February 2010 by Gordon Johnson in Brain Injury

, , ,

Timed with the Super Bowl, the consumer press has been doing extension coverage of the issue of concussions, brain injury, football and the NFL. For someone who has been doing almost nothing but represent those with brain injury for over 15 years that is welcome news, even if it does come with the risk that all of the focus is on what are usually the least severe of brain injuries.

The recent stories prompted Dr. Johnny Benjamin an orthopedic spine surgeon, to write a blog about it on the Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/johnny-benjamin/player-safety-in-the-nfl_b_454703.html

In his piece, “Whose Responsibility Was Player Safety in the NFL?,” Benjamin notes that Time magazine did a cover story on the topic, and that even The New Yorker has tackled it. Even Business Week recently chimed in on concussion awareness.
http://www.businessweek.com/lifestyle/content/healthday/635745.html

“Knowledgeable observers should be concerned that the medical director of the player’s union, the NFLPA, did not do enough to adequately protect his client/patients, the players,” Benjamin writes. “Virtually all meaningful advancement, dialogue and pressure that were exerted were provided by interested individuals, physician, researchers and journalists outside of the NFLPA’s medical director’s office.”

The Associated Press has been avidly writing about the concussion/sports issue. It did a story on the Zackery Lystedt Brain Project’s quest to have all 50 states pass law s setting safety guidelines for athletes who suffer head injuries.
http://www.latimes.com/sports/football/nfl/wire/sns-ap-fbh-high-school-concussions,0,7027744.story

The brain project is named in honor of a teenager who sustained brain injury when he went back to in a football after having a concussion in 2006. The advocacy group is lobbying for state laws similar to legislation on Washington state that mandates that athletes under 18 who are suspected of having a concussion must get written permission from a doctor before returning to play.

The AP also wrote a pre-Super Bowl story where it asked players on the Indianapolis Colts and the New Orleans Saints teams how many concussions they have sustained. http://www.latimes.com/sports/football/nfl/wire/sns-ap-fbn-super-bowl-concussions,0,156838.story

Saints defensive lineman Anthony Hargrove reportedly is the Saints player who has had the most concussions on his team, but he can’t remember exactly how many he has had, according to AP.

The kicker, a quote from retired NFL player Rod Woodson, is great on that AP story.

“Players are starting to realize how important it is to take care of your brain,” he said. “You only get one of them.”


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Olympic Sports Like Snowboarding and Skiing Rival Football In Terms of Injuries

0 comments

Posted on 8th February 2010 by Gordon Johnson in Brain Injury

, , , ,

A year ago, Natasha Richardson reminded all of us that sport concussions happen in sports other than football and that average people can suffer, not just famous athletes. With the Winter Games approaching it will be world class athletes who may stir up the conversation again, but in a newer sport, one without a tradition of safety: snowboarding.

There are already worries that snowboarders in Vancouver will be cracking their heads as they compete in the counterculture sport, as The San Francisco Chronicle called it, which was admitted to the Olympics in 1998.

The Chronicle noted that “maneuvers in the halfpipe have grown from exhilarating to terrifying in the four years since Shaun White won the gold in Turin, and the champ’s face smacked against the lip of the pipe at the Winter X Games last weekend, sending his helmet flying.” http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/02/07/SP921BR2N0.DTL

The International Olympics Committee is criticized for not setting safety standards for snowboarding, and letting the International Skiing Federation govern it.

The Miami Herald also weighed in on the issues, in a story headlined “Winter Olympics Flirting With Danger.” http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/olympics/story/1467130.html

The article cites snowboarder Kevin Pearce, who hit his forehead on the wall of a half-pipe and sustained traumatic brain injury. He is now at a long-term rehabilitation facility.

“Combine snow, ice, expressway speeds, six-story heights,” The Herald writes. “Think NASCAR on a slippery track or gymnastics with a helmet but without a mat. Imagine plunging down a slope as hard as concrete in a skinsuit or sliding down a roller coaster on a steel cookie sheet or flying through the air without a parachute.”

Not only snowboarders but skiers face serious injury, prompting some to call for safety reforms.

Will snowboarding reform? Will the thrill of the daredevil be replaced by some common sense about permanent damage to the minds of these young people?

We have been discussing the different trends of two of America’s most popular sports with respect to head injury risk in recent weeks. Today, at http://subtlebraininjury.com.blog we talk about the NFL’s growing commitment to player brain safety. Last week we talked about NASCAR’s preference for ratings rather than safety. The NFL seems to have learned that protecting its assets (the players) is more important than making the sport more sensational. NASCAR has clearly not.

We can only hope that the leaders of this Olympic sport show plan ahead rather than react to some tragedy.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Helmets Protect Skiiers, Snowboarders From Head Injuries

0 comments

Posted on 4th February 2010 by Gordon Johnson in Brain Injury

, , , ,

It is nothing new but a recent journal article argues that skiing and snowboarding enthusiasts should be wearing a helmet along with the rest of their gear, according to the Canadian Medical Association Journal.

The study found that helmets decrease the risk of head injury for skiers and snowboarders by 35 percent. http://www.ivanhoe.com/channels/p_channelstory.cfm?storyid=23501

Traumatic brain injury is the No. 1 cause of death for skiers and snowboarders, the Canadian Medical Association says. Head injuries make up as much as 19 percent of injuries in ski and snowboard accidents, while neck injuries are up to 4 percent.

According to an analysis of 12 studies done in North America, Europe and Asia, it is beneficial to wear helmets during recreational activities, other some argue that helmets can lead to neck injuries.

Remember Natasha Richardson? A Canadian death from skiing. There is never a guarantee that a helmet will eliminate brain injury, as the forces which can injure a brain include many that a helmet will not eliminate. But the helmet should eliminate almost all skull fractures and if designed properly, reduce some of the impact forces on the brain when the head hits something while skiing. The problem with skiing helmets, like all helmets, is making them energy absorbing without making them stick to the surface in falls. When a helmet sticks to a surface in a high speed fall, the neck can be broken.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney

Congressman Skewers College Football Conferences For Their Lenient Concussion Guidelines

0 comments

Posted on 2nd February 2010 by Gordon Johnson in Brain Injury

, , , , ,

A member of the House Judiciary Committee Monday blasted the Southeastern Conference and the Big 12 over their policies regarding student athletes and concussions, according to the Associated Press.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/02/sports/football/02concussions.html

Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., levied the criticism during a hearing in Houston on head injuries and college football. Specifically, Cohen questioned why major college football conferences had not adopted rules on dealing with concussions that went beyond what the National Collegiate Athletic Association requires, according to AP.

During the hearing, Cohen raised the question during his discussion with Ron Courson, who is director of sports medicine at the University of Georgia and part of the NCAA Committee on Competitive Safeguards and Medical Aspects of Sports.

Cohen “seemed incensed,” according to AP, when Courson said that none of the conferences had tougher regulations regarding concussions than the minimums mandated by the NCAA.

Cohen accused the college athletic programs of caring about “money, money, money,” AP reported.

On Monday there was also testimony by Texans guard Chester Pitts, who told the committee that he hopes his 3-year-old son Chester III never plays pro football, The Houston Chronicle reported in a very comprehensive story.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports/fb/texansfront/6846505.html
Pitts said that NFL football was “too rough a game,” according to the Chronicle. He played 112 NFL games without missing a start.

Pitts testified that he sustained his worst head injury while playing for San Diego State, and that the team hid his helmet to stop him from returning to the game, the Chronicle reported.

And former Rice University running back Trevor Cobb testified Monday that he had at least six concussions when he was playing football in high school, Rice and the NFL.

Monday’s hearing, held at the Prairie View A&M; College of Nursing, was the third one held by the House committee on brain injury and sports. It dealt with high school and college athletes. The first two hearings dealt with the NFL and its policies regarding concussions and players.

Neuropathologist Dr. Bennett Omalu, co-founder and director of the Brian Injury Research Instistute of West Virginia University, also testified in Houston Monday. He is a pioneer in linking concussions from football to permanent brain damage in players.

Omalu recommended that youths under 18, whose brains are still developing, should not be allowed to play until at least three months after concussion, so they won’t sustain permanent brain damage from additional hits on the field, the Houston Chronicle reported.


Attorney Gordon Johnson
Chair Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group, American Association of Justice
g@gordonjohnson.com :: 800-992-9447 :: Attorney Gordon S. Johnson, Jr.

http://subtlebraininjury.com :: http://brainanatomyguide.com :: http://car-accident-rain.com :: http://tbilaw.com
http://waiting.com :: http://vestibulardisorder.com :: http://youtube.com/profile?user=braininjuryattorney